[HWTS] W01 - Fecal Indicator
need for fecal indicator
- most pathogens of water borne diseases originate from human or animal feces
- it is impossible practically to detect all pathogens that cause diarrheal disease individually
- so indicator species are used to identify feces contamination
ideal properties of indicator species
- be universally present in feces of humans and animals
- be present in higher numbers than fecal pathogens
- not be actually pathogenic
- be readily detected by simple inexpensive methods
- persist in water in a similar manner to fecel pathogens
- not multiply in natural waters
- respond to treatment in a similar manner to fecal pathogens
common indicator species
- total coliforms (TC)
- bacterial species
- ferment lactose and produce acid and gas at 35ºC
- many families of coliforms
- citrobacter
- klebsiella
- hafnia
- enterobacter
- e.coli
- salmonella
- shigella
- yersinia
- not a useful fecal indicator since there are many non-fecal sources for these bacteria
- useful in monitoring effectiveness of water treatment
- to test cleanliness and integrity in a water distribution system
- thermotolerant coliforms (TTC)
- a subset of TC
- ferment lactose within 48 h at 44ºC
- previously fecel coliforms
-
10^6 - 10^9 cells per gram feces
- some indication of non-fecal TTC
- klebsiella, some enterobacter
- may grow or die off at ambient temperature
- escherichia coli (EC)
- most suitable fecal indicator
- some possibility of growth of environment
- only moderately persistent, resistant
- better options compared to the other
- these indicator bacteria are reported in terms of
- number of counts or colonies in a 100 mL sample
- many drinking water standards and WHO guide
- prescribe no detectable E Coli or thermotolerant coliform
- water that has higher levels of indicator bacteria
- has more fecal contamination
- but there is no clear correlation between indicator bacteria and pathogens
-
water having more than 1000 count / mL is very risky for consumption
- however, even water with no detectable e.coli is not perfectly safe
- as e.coli is less persistent and robust in the environment compared to some pathogens
- so the e.coli indicator should be used to complement some on-site inspection at the water source
- not as the only metric to decide the safety of drinking water
- on-site inspection identifies risk factor ratings
other fecel indicators
- coliphage viruses: require bacteria for hosts
- fecal streptococci: lower numbers than coliforms; more persistent, resistant
- bacterial spores: similar to protozoa, highly persistent, resistant
- clostrodium perfringens
- bacillus spp
F-Diagram
- pathogens in feces dont cause diseases unless they are ingested
- the F-Diagram shows the path ways for pathogens to get to faces from feces
- fluids: contaminated fluids going to the face
- fingers: contaminated fingers going to the face
- flies: flies transmitting by contact
- fields: poor sanitation
- floods: poor sanitation
- food affected by all the above
opportunities for contamination
- water resource itself:
- by human or animal species
- in the delivery system
- if there isn’t enough pressure in the delivery system
- contaminated water enters through pipes or joints
- improperly constructed rising main on a borehole, or suction hand pumps
- collection and transport
- when the point of collection is outside the home
- unclean hands
- household storage
- open containers
- dust and insects
- children and animals introduce pathogens
- retrieved using unclean ladels
- consumption
- cups might be contaminated with fecal matter
- cups might be wiped clean with hands
- but this actually makes it dirtier
- HWT aims to clean water targeting contamination introduced at all these opportunities