[HWTS] W01 - SDG Baselines for Drinking Water Services
Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) for Drinking Water
Goal 6
- goal #6 is for safe water and sanitation
-
#6.1 is for safe drinking water: achieve universal and equitable access to safe and affordable drinking water for all
- current status - map visualization
- 2018 report
- further info
- wash agenda
- wash agenda
- 2017 report
yardstick for measuring completion
- said population uses improved water sources
- source accessible on premises
- available when needed
- water free from fecal and priority chemical contamination
improved water sources
- examples:
- tap water in dwelling, yard or pot
- public standposts
- boreholes, tubewells
- protected wells and springs
- rain water
- packaged and delivered water
unimproved sources
- unprotected wells and springs
- surface water
classification of drinking water
- in order of reducing level of quality, water supply service is classified as follows
- safely managed:
- located on premises
- available when needed
- free from fecal and priority chemical contamination
- basic
- improved source
- collection time is not more than 30 minutes
- including round trip and q-ing
- limited
- collection time exceeds 30 minutes
- including round trip and q-ing
- unimproved
- unprotected dug well
- unprotected spring
- surface water
- directly from river, dam, lake, pond, stream, canal, or irrigation canal
- safely managed:
water supply service considerations
accessibility
- on premises
- within 30 minutes
- continuity of supply
- sufficiency
contamination-free
- free from e.coli, thermo-tolerant coliforms
- free from two chemicals
- arsenic,
- fluoride
data collection
direct surveys
- data is collected about water services across the world through household surveys and censuses
- available for most DHS and MICS countries
- self reported continuity and sufficiency by households
- new modules to test e.coli
sector data
accessibility - distance
- household connections
- maximum distances
accessibility - sufficiency
- continuity of piped supplies
- different benchmarks and standards
accessibility - contamination
- typically only formal systems, mainly urban
- some lack e.coli or thermo-tolerant coliform tests
- many lack arsenic and fluoride tests
- some report compliance for multiple parameters
inferences from data collected
- improved water sources are not always safe
- piped water supply is safer than other methods, no e.coli in piped water
- other sources like rainwater harvesting
fig: water contamination levels across water sources
challenges and responses
data gaps
- water quality
- rural areas
- availability
programmatic implications
- water quality management
- water safety plans
- strengthening regulation
- progressive regulation
national targets
- water supply
- 100% population on improved sources
- 95% use piped water supplies (not global, important for some local cases)
- accessibility
- 100% use improves sources within 30 minutes
- 95% have water being supplied at the home or courtyard
- availability
- 90% of population at 40+ liters per capita per day
- piped water supplies 24 hours per day (large systems)
- piped water supplies 12 hours per day
- quality
- 100% of piped water meets standards for Arsenic and Fluoride
- 80% piped water meets e.coli standard 95% of the time
- 90% piped supply meets standards for residual chlorine (not global, important for some local cases)
- water safety plans implemented in all piped water supplies (not global, important for some local cases)
- other (not global, important for some local cases)
- reduce non-revenue water in piped supplies to 25%
- 80% of households on piped supplies are metered
- water bills should not exceed 3% of GNI per capita