[HWTS] W05 - Assessing Impact
reasons to assess HWTS
- understand if the HWTS tech is actually achieving the objective of improving health
- by removing the pathogens that cause the diarrheal disease
- if treating a particular outbreak, then direct checks towards that
- else make sure all common pathogens are targets
- communicate effectiveness of HWTS devices to governments, implementers and investors
- those groups of people do not have any methods to evaluate performance
- enforce correct and consistent use of HWTS tech
- to maximize health benefits
WHO recommendations on evaluating HWTS
goal:
- protect health of users, increase access to safe water
target pathogens:
- viruses
- bacteria
- protozoa
derivation of targets
- based on WHO guidelines for drinking water risk-based approach
- (QMRA models)
tiered approach:
- highly protective
- moderately protective
- limited protection
laboratory protocols:
- provides best practice principle
assessing performance
log-removal
- highly protective (10^-6 DALYs/P/yr)
- bacteria: ≥ 4
- viruses: ≥ 5
- protozoa: ≥ 4
- examples
- boiling
- ultrafilters
- combined approaches
- moderately protective (10^-4 DALYs/P/yr)
- bacteria: ≥ 2
- viruses: ≥ 3
- protozoa: ≥ 2
- examples
- membrane filters
- flocculant disinfectant
- limited protection
- protective for two classes of pathogens
- examples
- chlorine
- ceramic filters
- biosand filters
benefits
- even low economic regions can benefit from limited protection
test water
- two types of test water:
- model actual field condition
- pH
- temperature
- TOC
- turbidity
- TDS
- alkalinity
- model actual field condition
- GTW (general testing water)
- representing high quality groundwater or rainwater
- non-stresses phase of testing
- not technology specific
- CTW (challenge testing water)
- representing turbid surface-water
- stresses challenge phase of testing
- based on the product’s technology
WHO scheme to evaluate HWT
- promote independent testing of HWTS based on WHO criteria
- support governments in building technical capability of research institutions
- especially in applying WHO guidelines on drinking-water quality
diffusion of innovation
- five stages
- knowledge
- persuasion
- decision
- implementation
- confirmation
- five attributes of innovation
- relative advantage
- compatibility
- complexity
- trialability
- observability
RANAS theory of behavior change
- Risks
- perceived vulnerability
- perceived severity
- factual knowledge
- Abilities
- action knowledge
- self-efficacy
- Norms
- descriptive
- injunctive
- personal
- Attitudes
- instrumental beliefs
- affective beliefs
- Self-regulation
- action control/planning
- coping planning
- remembering
- commitment
Integrated Behavioral Model - WAHS
- three classes of factors
- contextual
- psychosocial
- technology
- five levels
- societal.structural
- community
- interpersonal.household
- individual
- habitual
EAWAG monitoring and Evaluation Toolkit Indicators
- reported and observed use
- correct, consistent use and storage
- knowledge and behavior
- other environmental health interventions
- water quality
Cost Effectiveness
- cost-benefit analysis
- money for money
- cost effectiveness analysis
- money for DALYs
- willingness to pay
- money for HWTS
formal HWTS selection
- the selection steps are as follows
- establish decision context
- identify options
- identify objectives, criteria
- scoring
- weighting
- calculate tools
- examine results
- sensitivity analysis
- decision trees are used to obtain the implementation rationale for a given scenario
field tests for e.coli
- challenges of testing in labs
- distance
- testing should be done within 6-24h
- new options for testing in field
- most probable number methods
- portable membrane filtration
- enzyme growth media
- low-cost incubators
- application is mics surveys
- millipore microfil filtration
- nissui compact dry EC plates
- body belt incubation
summary of process
- a glass of water people would drink
-
a sample from the source
- filtered through special paper
- allow bacteria to grow
- e.coli preferred indicator of fecal contamination
-
count the colonies
- 100mL test
- for low contamination
- 1 mL test
- for high contamination
equipment
- plastic funnels
- plastic syringe (100 mL)
- plastic syringe (1 mL)
- pen
- filter instrument
- alcohol wipe
- filter paper
- forceps
- growth media (compact dry)
analysis
- consistency checks
- 100mL vs 1 mL results
- quality control
- blanks
- expert visits
- risk classes
- < 1: low
- 1 - 10: intermediate
- 11 - 100: high
- 100+: very high
- standard tables, scripts
- summary reports, detailed reports